Auto industry allies hope to secure up to $50 billion in government loans this month that would pay to modernize plants and build more fuel-efficient vehicles.
- Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.
- Public Discussion (56)
No loan. It is simply a bailout of unions.
Let them fail. It is good for the Japanese economy
- 1 vote
Ubions? You have to be kidding. You must be high up in the auto industry.
We are taught that competition is good and to buy where our money is best spent. After living in SE MI and working in and around the autos for 30 yrs, it's my opinion that we not prop these guys up any more. Just as the union supports doing the least possible and charging top dollar, so have the companies been doing the bare minimum and charging us top dollar for their product. The union/mgmt relationship is two sides of the same coin. The sides just serve a different bank account. The union fights mgmt at every turn, strikes because "I knew I could..." and forces them to have more employees than necessary, all the while claiming to uphold American values and work ethic and spending their paycheck at WalMart. The Mgmt then pays them back by making their day miserable. The companies were getting around CAFE laws by building SUVs and inundating us with ads for them. Now they aren't prepared for the change and want special considerations, this from the industry that used 911 as an advertising opportunity. Obviously I'm not a fan. The American auto industry has a broken structure and 50 billion isn't what they need.
To Congress: if you do provide loans, keep them small and on a short leash.
They say they want the money to "RETOOL". Let them get a LOAN to retool their plants to produce fuel free or at minimum 50mpg cars.
- 1 vote
How did you view the S.&L. bailout in the 1980's? If you like the Japanese economy so well, why don't you move there? AMERICA, LOVE IT OR LEAVE IT! how did you view the bailout of Behr Stearns, and how about the present bailout of "Freddy" and "Fanny"? Just where does your loyalty lie?
You are correct the auto companies spent millions yearly trying to kill the unions. The real problem is poor management.
Our government has given hundreds of billions over the years to innovate and create better cars. Nearly all the money wasted and ended up in management's pockets.
Google who killed the electric car?
- 1 vote
Authur:
"Google who killed the electric car?"
Don't need to, I own it and I think you're right, they already have the technology, but I'm not sure that they have the set up to switch over to mass producing EV-1's by the millions say, tomorrow.
I don't know, I NEVER know when it comes to these things, to be honest. I mean, on the one hand, we can't REWARD these idiots at the top for screwing up by bailing them out, but on the other hand, just telling them: "well tough cookies" doesn't seem like it would end well for your average factory worker who's in their lines either, or the stores they go to, or the daycare center they put their kids in when they're at work, or their kids when they need money for school supplies...
Like I said. I don't know in these situations and never really do because while I would love to see the incompetent CEO placed against the nearest wall and shot just on general principles... I DON'T want to see the poor schmuck who just wants to get through the day screwed over for doing nothing more then trying to feed their kids - not to mention, shudder at what a whole bunch of them suddenly out of work would do to our already messed up economy (a result that's pretty much a given if nothing is done at all).
Gee sounds like we have to reward the spoiled kids again at our expense.
Another industry where CEO's make millions a year. Again proving they are not competant to run a business. Let them belly up. Sorry its has to stop somewhere, if we give them money we will just end up doing it over and over and over.
They should have seen this coming and been retooling and getting ready for the future a decade ago. but, they werent now there fat salaries are about to go away.
there is not 1 CEO in this country worth a 1 million dollar a year salary. why do we keep pandering to them.
Most of them as proven with fannie and freddie are not capable to run a dog kennel let alone a big business.
to jail with them all.
Actually, cyan, that's an idea that has a certain amount of merit, but again, I don't want to screw over some poor guy that just wants to keep a roof over their head and didn't do a damned thing wrong....
So, why don't we compromise?
Hard time for the CEO's and I mean, HARD TIME- none of this "white-collar jail" crap
AND
We turn the companies over to the biggest rabble-rousers IN said company who have been hollering to the high hills for all these years that none of the idiotic schemes of the CEO's that destroyed the company was going to work.
The CEO's don't get rewarded, the man on the street doesn't get screwed, and by turning it over to people who have been making actual SENSE, we may actually stand a chance of solving the problem. Beyond that, it sets a really NICE precedent for the rest of them not to try the same tricks ever again.
How's that?:)
We keep hearing politicians & various companies using the the word "billion" in such a casual manner, think about whether you want these politicians spending your tax money. A BILLION... (some things to think about)
- A billion seconds ago it was 1959.
- A billion minutes ago Jesus was alive.
- A billion hours ago our ancestors were living in the Stone Age.
- A billion days ago no-one walked on the earth on two feet.
- A billion dollars ago was only 8 hours and 20 minutes, at the rate our government is spending it.
It is thrown around a lot but it is more than you think it is, and remember it is coming out of our pockets. I don't know about you, but my money is tight enough without the gov taking more of it and giving it to oil companies, car companies, etc... and hundreds of billions overseas. Iraq has universal health care, new roads, new schools and hospitals, now wants to send billions to Georgia, to Israel, to various other countries. What about our country, our starving kids, our schools, hospitals, roads, etc... when is it going to stop and we start taking care of our own country and children FIRST, then help out others?
- 1 vote
Found someone with a brain, the word billion is used so casually that it now seems like a million when it's 1000 million, I fully agree here we are taking care of everyone else but our own, now here's a thought If the people in government had to actually do some physical work to earn the pay they get and get paid like the rest of us in real life then maybe they would understand the true value of a billion dollars ..
You know, I feel absolutely no sympathy for the auto companies themselves. None. The winds of major change have been blowing for several years now and Ford seems to be the only company that has come up with options to meet new demands. It is unfortunate, however, that their efforts haven't matched those of foreign (read: Asian) auto makers. I think that they need to feel the crunch in order to make the necessary adjustments to their future plans. I regrettably (or not) see GM being bought out by one of the other giant world auto companies. Toyota? BMW? Maybe even Renault? Who knows? The ones who I cannot bear to see suffer are the workers, whose health care plans and pensions - not to mention salaries - have been compromised over the past several years to make up for managerial mistakes. So, when I read that the major auto makers of America are heading to Congress with their hands outstretched, asking for a Federal loan to tide them over until the winds blow in the 6-mpg-SUV direction again, I say, "Go to Munich, Tokyo or Paris and ask someone to take over operations." Maybe not Ford, though, since they have at least had the foresight to produce small, efficient gasoline cars. Maybe Bush's Cabinet could bail Ford out in the same way it is bailing out Freddie and Fannie. Er, wait, I thought the Republicans wanted -less- government interference in corporate America...
My two cents.
Its simple. American car makers are trying to get us, the tax payers to bail them out from there mistakes. American auto makers have poor designs, poor quality, and horrible gas mileage compared to foreign car makers. I for one would love to see all American car makers, go out of business, or bought by an Asian or euro company. American car makers don't see the future or how and what to design for the future. They live in the now and the now only. They are greedy, blind, and like most of that generation controlling large corporations, always want someone to bail them out.
They have nothing but excuses for not having or bringing fuel efficient cars to the auto market, but in the mean time Japan has produced small, 40+ MPG cars for years. The auto makers will say, small cars cant be produced in America easily cause there isn't a marker, when they are the ones creating the market. American auto makers blame the safety and design of smaller cars as an issue. Although other countries design some of the safest small cars in the world. Funny how American car makers cant produce a small safe car, but can build large safe gas guzzling suv's. Its all about greed. And a lack of vision. American car makers deserve everything the get, and if that means they are out of jobs, so be it. I think we should be able to vote as American tax payers, if we want our tax money to go to the American car makers. Do we want them to be bailed out. I don't. Will the government bail me out if I'm in financial trouble just because of poor judgement and blind vision. No way. We are the consumer. We just vote, we done give.
I say, let them suffer. As Americans, we will all benefit is they go out of business or sold or taken over.
Agreed. As in any corporation, in order to survive by keeping a competitive edge, a company must stay one-step ahead of its competitor. The American auto industry (and I bought only AMERICAN made cars until just three years ago) are very poorly built.
There was a time when Ford "built trucks to last," but that was 30 or so years ago. They're just not built that way any more.
The Japanese and Germans have for the last 30 years built the very best cars in the entire World, and they reign supreme in the auto industry. That's just a fact. This is one area where we have to concede and just say, OK, we don't do that so great any more. I, for one, am fine with the American Auto Industry closing their doors because they've FAILED!
The American automakers have had not true leadership in their industry for years; they've mismanaged their production sites, they have no vision, they haven't stayed ahead of the competition, and keep asking for more and more government bailsouts.
It's one thing to fail and "learn" from that failure. It's quite another when these companies keep failing and failing and failing, never learning from their mistakes. IF the government bails them out, it's throwing good money after bad, IMHO.
- 1 vote
This from companies that said they couldn't build fuel eff' cars and needed tax credits to build more trucks and 7 passenger suv's couldn't meet fuel eff standards without massive layoffs and the unions went along now they need money to build cars they couldn't build in 40 yrs what happened to the winkel engine or the 4/6/8 engine ? yet Honda/ toyota don't seem to build these auto's electric ? just getting to them NOW ? maybe next year yet Honda has been making these for years while US automakers laughted fuel efficent cars? Let them have more cup holders that can't hold a cup from spilling Let them have it people As with all things the Bean counters have WON
Let us remember Lee Iaccoca
Is there a 3 strike limit for Auto manufacturers?
Why try and compete if the government is going to come to the rescue every time the managment makes bad judgments? They have been against higher fuel efficiency mandates for years. Looks like a government of the corporation by the corporation. Next in line should be the airlines to get government backed loans to buy new, more fuel efficient planes. Who will be next for the tax payer bailout?
- 1 vote
Only a moron wouldnt have seen that the auto industry needed to change. But instead of planning for fuel efficient cars, the automakers continued to produce the high profit, environment destroying vehicles. They even continued to fight better gas milage vehicles saying they couldnt meet more fuel efficient guidelines. So if they cant meet the guidelines maybe its better they are allowed to go out of business. I am sure the executives continued to collect their big bonuses year after year. Bail them out? They dont deserve it.
why dont the companies use their record profits to pay for the retooling of their plants. if they can make billions in profits, then they should be able to use those profits to pay for thier own plant upgrades. dont increase the burden on government, use your own money. ceo's: be ethical and take a pay cut!!!!!
And the punchline...
"Something has to happen pretty quickly because they can't compete paying 15 to 20 percent (interest)."
These people are obviously not consumers.
- 1 vote
HA HA , if anybody thinks Bush or McCAIN is going to help out the automakers in our country their mistaking ,,,, our country OWES china , india , maybe even russia interest and money on whats been borrowed already to fight unnessary wars . Its costing our country dearly to be over in Iraq and Afganistan
This is a good point, and additionaly, who is going to purchase these cars? Unemployment is up, donations to charity and the food supply is down, retailers are going out of business, and what's the point of building more cars that people can not afford. The government continues to give money they don't have, and to loan money they can't pay back, and if they continue to pick up these failing companies, where does it all end? Time to slow down and take a good look at a good plan.
Having lived in Detroit and worked as a consultant at Ford - I say let them go out of business - they deserve it for being one of the most mismanaged, lackluster, inefficient company I have advised. It starts at the top and goes right down to the over paid union workers who on a given sunny day, hundered don't even bother showing up for work not even having the decency to call in sick.
But they are also a scum bag company.
1. It's a known fact (from court records) that they let their customers burn in the Ford Pinto case because they said it was more cost efficient to pay injury settlements then pay for a $75 fix.
2. The rollovers from the tire blowouts that killed scores was also another coverup.
3. Their Crown Victoria police cars that killed numerous cops whose cars were being rear-ended and blowing up was not immediately addressed as cops died. They said, that police cars were more apt to be rearended due to traffic stops on freeways...funny how the Chevy Impalas were not blowing up.
As for the rest of them (GM and Chrysler) they are old school businesses that didn't have the smarts to change their big car concepts when oil was running short in supply in the 70' the 80's and now...as they stand around with their dicks in their hand saying duh...
This economic downturn is doing what is should do - get rid of by market forces all the crummy companies that deserve to go out of business because of shoddy workmanship/quality, excesses, poor managment, terrible customer service and not being smart or flexible enough to learn from the past and adjust for the future.
As far as all those unfortunate employees - I believe it's the employees that make the company what it is...and are just as much to blame for their demise as is upper-management...along with the unions sticking it the management...
- 2 votes
Hi Kenneth. I'm not an automaker consultant, but see my post 6.1. The majority of the American public can see that what you're saying is absolutely the truth and 100% correct in that America should get OUT of the car making business. There's no saving what CANNOT be saved. It's throwing good money after bad. Automobile making is no longer one of America's greatest strengths, and we need to "get of the business" all together. I'm sorry to see people lose jobs, but I'm more tired of the government bailouts that hit ALL tax payers. MAYBE some of the "machinists" will GET A CLUE, and tail between legs head for Seattle, and work for Boeing, perhaps a 'LITTLE' more humbled and WILLING TO WORK from the experience.
I, for one, would love to hear more of what you have to say and your experience as a consultant with the automaking industry. What were your findings? How LONG did you remain there consulting after you gave them YOUR REPORT? LOL!!! I'm sure your services were NO LONGER required! LMAO!!!
Sandra -1 good story...among several
One day I was sitting in a meeting and asked a simple question - How are you tracking the premium freight shipments (trucks coming into the plants to pick up finished products vs outbound rail shipments). The answer was - We don't.
I was dumbfounded by this and did a little research and found that since they didn't track or schedule trucks - that the trucks were showing up hours before their loads were ready. They'd park in these huge lots and then charge Ford demurrage (sitting around doing nothing) charges of $25 an hour.
More research found that they were losing between $1.3M and $1.7M in the charges annually in just North American Stamping (all the plants, times the all the trucks times 365 days added up).
So, I designed a process for tracking these shipments along with having my guys from my company develop a prototype application for tracking and scheduling with the 3PL that scheduled contract carriers.
The software was quoted at $25,000 to develop. Ford came back and said we will develop it in-house at I-Tek.
Of course I-Tek got a hold of it and the cost ballooned to just over $250K. Stamping Business Unit IT - said, we don't have the money in the budget for this.
So, what would have cost them $25K to save millions was scrapped. I don't know if they ever fixed the problem but I doubt it...it's the way they do business and why their stock and company is in the "tank".
The head of the Stamping Business Unit IT at the time is another classic example of what is wrong with Ford and I am sure happens in other companies - they have a really good engineer or software developer and after several promotions they can't promote them within their area of expertise any more - so they make them managers of people...when in many cases they aren't leaders of people...and it really showed with this guy.
If I'm dumb enough to invest all my money in buggy whip futures, do I deserve a low-interest government loan until I can figure out a more farsighted investment strategy?
Like other overpaid titans of industry, U.S. auto executives love to preach about free markets; now it's time for them walk the talk, or sell out to the Japanese, who really do know how to run a car company.
- 1 vote
Maybe they can borrow from Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac!!!! Taxpayers will end up paying for all of these irresponsible action as we are with these failed mortgage giants...Might as well just go on welfare..At least I will have health care, housing, and a paycheck..
- 1 vote
This has nothing to do with unions, Germans and Japanese treat their workers much better and do not look at workers as adversaries, but as contributors to car development.
50 Billion for the same old crap, they should have been investing into alternative energy vehicles but these car companies did not care and now they have their nerve to have the government prop them up so they can so call retool, I wonder how much will be used to give themselves a nice pay raise while they close plants and lay off more workers, they know the end is close and I say let them fail, they should have looked to the future instead of just doing business as usual ....
- 2 votes
What the heck happened to this country? Since 9-11 and the airline bail out, entire industries think they can bleat out requests for money from Congress for their lack of foresight? As a taxpayer, I'm left wondering when will enough be enough? So the car companies want to update their plants to make modern cars? Maybe they should have built more plants in the US instead of in Mexico or other low labor spots around the globe. Maybe they should have kept a major presence (industrial-wise) in this country instead of leaving several communities in the lurch. Maybe they should have listened to people who were considered crackpots 15 years ago and began investing in alternative fuel vehicles. These are the same companies that cry and wail when required to meet safety or fuel economy standards? The same ones who don't want the tougher standards for pollution control to be lawful in California? Who ever votes for this aide in anyway will either lose my vote for President or definitely lose my interest in sharing their party.
- 1 vote
I would rather see money spent on roads and bridges built by people that need a job for the vehicles that are driven by those workers.That's AMERICA.
These morons have had since 1973 to retool and do something other than try to make a profit. They've let technology, Honda, Toyota etal pass them by. That's 35 years of inaction and claiming that they couldn't make money on small cars while they produced them en masse for world markets.
I spent 30+ years in the automobile biz. Most of us shook our heads in constant amazement at what the American mfgs put on lots for sale. It got to a point in the late 90's-early 00's where the only thing they actually were selling was trucks and suvs. The cars they put out were so substandard to what Honda and Toyota put out that the only people who bought them (their cars) were people who couldn't get financed at a Honda or Toyota store. Now they want the American public to bail them out "for the good of the country" or some nonsense like that.
I say let em sink or swim or sell out to mfgs who know how to build product that people actually want to buy!
=
- 1 vote
Auto makers should have to present a plan for use of the money, with solid statistics that support what they will be manufacturing as a result of the loans. The process should be considered by whoever makes the decision to approve, and the money should be distributed the same as a construction loan where permits and instructions are part of the process.
If a plain old citizen want s to borrow money to open a business, they are required to present business plan to include the financial plan as well. Too much money is given out with too little justification. Why do we as citizens sit by and let this happen?
in Minnesota we bailed out Northwest airlines many times with "loans" to this day they have not been repayed.
so lets use the word "give" instead of "loan"
25 billion isn't enough? C'mon! Now we need 50.....id say get the heck outta my office and dont come back till you get some sense! Even 25 billion! Ya know, to support a idea like that is stupid. They can build cars just as effective with the Asians, but the cost in pay alone to pay auto workers is crazy.
I'm all for having someone there for the working guy and all that, but the unions are b.s. How much money does a union get from each of those people that work there? What does the UNION do for them? Guarantees their job. well if you do your job there should be a need for one. I paid $9,000 dollars to the union for insurance, in 1 year. My daughter needed to see a therapist, and the UNION decided they were not covering it. If employees can do a honest days work, they have no fear in losing a job, and money saved to the company for the increase in wage just to pay for it cause the UNION needs money, the savings alone would keep the company efficient. Go UNIONS
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead. |



